This was accidentally broken in c8e0f7848b
due to a one-letter mistake in the plug option name and an absence of
tests. Therefore it was once again possible to serve e.g. Javascript or
CSS payloads via uploads and emoji.
However due to other protections it was still NOT possible for anyone to
serve any payload with an ActivityPub Content-Type. With the CSP policy
hardening from previous JS payload exloits predating the Content-Type
sanitisation, there is currently no known way of abusing this weakened
Content-Type sanitisation, but should be fixed regardless.
This commit fixes the option name and adds tests to ensure
such a regression doesn't occur again in the future.
Reported-by: Lain Soykaf <lain@lain.com>
When note editing support was added, it was omitted to strip internal
fields from edited notes and their history.
This was uncovered due to Mastodon inlining the like count as a "likes"
collection conflicting with our internal "likes" list causing validation
failures. In a spot check with likes/like_count it was not possible to
inject those internal fields into the local db via Update, but this
was not extensively tested for all fields and avenues.
Similarly address normalisation did not normalise addressing in the
object history, although this was never at risk of being exploitable.
The revision history of the Pleroma MR adding edit support reveals
recusrive stripping was intentionally avoided, since it will end up
removing e.g. emoji from outgoing activities. This appears to still
be true. However, all current internal fields ("pleroma_interal"
appears to be unused) contain data already publicised otherwise anyway.
In the interest of fixing a federation bug (and at worst potential data
injection) quickly outgoing stripping is left non-recursive for now.
Of course the ultimate fix here is to not mix remote and internal data
into the same map in the first place, but unfortunately having a single
map of all truth is a core assumption of *oma's AP doc processing.
Changing this is a masive undertaking and not suitable for providing
a short-term fix.
This matches behaviour prioir to the SigningKey migration
and the expected semantics of the http_signatures lib.
Additionally add a min interval paramter, to avoid
refetch floods on bugs causing incompatible signatures
(like e.g. currently with Bridgy)
User updates broke with the migration to separate signing keys
since user data carries signing keys but we didn't allow the
association data to be updated.
Previously there were mainly two attack vectors:
- for raw keys the owner <-> key mapping wasn't verified at all
- keys were retrieved with refetching allowed
and only the top-level ID was sanitised while
usually keys are but a subobject
This reintroduces public key checks in the user actor,
previously removed in 9728e2f8f7
but now adapted to account for the new mapping mechanism.
User.get_or_fetch_by_(apid|nickname) are the only external users of fetch_and_prepare_user_from_ap_id,
thus there’s no point in duplicating logging, expecially not at error level.
Currently (duplicated) _not_found errors for users make up the bulk of my logs
and are created almost every second. Deleted users are a common occurence and not
worth logging outside of debug
This query is one of the top cost offenders during an instances
lifetime. For small instances it was shown to take up 30-50% percent of
the total database query time, while for bigger isntaces it still held
a spot in the top 3 — alost as or even more expensive overall than
timeline queries!
The good news is, there’s a cheaper way using the instance table:
no need to process each entry, no need to filter NULLs
and no need to dedupe. EXPLAIN estimates the cost of the
old query as 13272.39 and the cost of the new query as 395.74
for me; i.e. a 33-fold reduction.
Results can slightly differ. E.g. we might have an old user
predating the instance tables existence and no interaction with since
or no instance table entry due to failure to query nodeinfo.
Conversely, we might have an instance entry but all known users got
deleted since.
However, this seems unproblematic in practice
and well worth the perf improvment.
Given the previous query didn’t exclude unreachable instances
neither does the new query.
There were two issues leading to needles effort:
Most importnatly, the use of AP IDs as "source_url" meant multiple
simultaneous jobs got scheduled for the same instance even with the
default unique settings.
Also jobs were scheduled uncontionally for each processed AP object
meaning we incured oberhead from managing Oban jobs even if we knew it
wasn't necessary. By comparison the single query to check if an update
is needed should be cheaper overall.
It was used to migrate OStatus connections to ActivityPub if possible,
but support for OStatus was long since dropped, all new actors always AP
and if anything wasn't migrated before, their instance is already marked
as unreachable anyway.
The associated logic was also buggy in several ways and deleted users
got set to ap_enabled=false also causing some issues.
This patch is a pretty direct port of the original Pleroma MR;
follow-up commits will further fix and clean up remaining issues.
Changes made (other than trivial merge conflict resolutions):
- converted CHANGELOG format
- adapted migration id for Akkoma’s timeline
- removed ap_enabled from additional tests
Ported-from: https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/merge_requests/3880
Otherwise attachments have a high chance to disappear with akkoma-fe’s
“delete & redraft” feature when cleanup is enabled in the backend. Since
we don't know whether a deletion was intended to be part of a redraft
process or even if whether the redraft was abandoned we still have to
delete attachments eventually.
A thirty minute delay should provide sufficient time for redrafting.
Fixes: https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma/issues/775
Current logic unconditionally adds public adressing to "cc"
and follower adressing to "to" after attempting to strip it
from the other one. This creates serious problems:
First the bug prompting this investigation and fix,
unconditional addition creates duplicates when adressing
URIs already were in their intended final field; e.g.
this is prominently the case for all "unlisted" posts.
Since List.delete only removes the first occurence,
this then broke follower-adress stripping later on
making the policy ineffective.
It’s also just not safe in general wrt to non-public adressing:
e.g. pre-existing duplicates didn’t get fully stripped,
bespoke adressing modes with only one of public addressing
or follower addressing are mangled — and most importantly:
any belatedly received DM or follower-only post
also got public adressing added!
Shockingly this last point was actually asserted as "correct" in tests;
it appears to be a mistake from mindless match adjustments
while fixing crashes on nil adressing in
10c792110e.
Clean up this sloppy logic up, making sure no more duplicates are
added by us, all instances of relevant adresses are purged and only
readded when they actually existed to begin with.
Current AP spec demands anonymous objects to have an id value,
but explicitly set it to JSON null. Howeveras it turns out this is
incompatible with JSON-LD requiring `@id` to be a string and thus AP
spec is incompatible iwth the Ativity Streams spec it is based on.
This is an issue for (the few) AP implementers actually performing
JSON-LD processing, like IceShrimp.NET.
This was uncovered by IceShrimp.NET’s zotan due to our adoption of
anonymous objects for emoj in f101886709.
The issues is being discussed by W3C, and will most likely be resolved
via an errata redefining anonymous objects to completely omit the id
field just like transient objects already do. See:
https://github.com/w3c/activitypub/issues/476
Fixes: https://akkoma.dev/AkkomaGang/akkoma/issues/848
Since we now remember the final location redirects lead to
and use it for all further checks since
3e134b07fa, these redirects
can no longer be exploited to serve counterfeit objects.
This fixes:
- display URLs from independent webapp clients
redirecting to the canonical domain
- Peertube display URLs for remote content
(acting like the above)
As hinted at in the commit message when strict checking
was added in 8684964c5d,
refetching is more robust than display URL comparison
but in exchange is harder to implement correctly.
A similar refetch approach is also employed by
e.g. Mastodon, IceShrimp and FireFish.
To make sure no checks can be bypassed by forcing
a refetch, id checking is placed at the very end.
This will fix:
- Peertube display URL arrays our transmogrifier fails to normalise
- non-canonical display URLs from alternative frontends
(theoretical; we didnt’t get any actual reports about this)
It will also be helpful in the planned key handling overhaul.
The modified user collision test was introduced in
https://git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma/-/merge_requests/461
and unfortunately the issues this fixes aren’t public.
Afaict it was just meant to guard against someone serving
faked data belonging to an unrelated domain. Since we now
refetch and the id actually is mocked, lookup now succeeds
but will use the real data from the authorative server
making it unproblematic. Instead modify the fake data further
and make sure we don’t end up using the spoofed version.
